Two thought here:
1.1. In one light, this results in “governance inflation” where each additional token has diminishing marginal returns; in practice, however, this is proportional to who actually uses their tokens.
1.2. We should consider switching to a system where the DAO sells citizenships on the primary market (competing with its own secondary market). This would have benefits during bear markets but even more so during bull markets. And, to signal commitment to the DAO, bounties awardees could use their USDC to “buy back in”.
That’s true currently; however a proper system of QV would grant people multiple votes per token. QV is designed to enable the expression of magnitude of preference, something we don’t currently take advantage of.
That’s true, but i’m not sure all bounties should be awarded with ownership.