Note: Based on feedback received, this CIP will be modified and then reposted.
TLDR - This CIP has 4 Goals: | |
---|---|
1. Adjust Quorums | |
2. Hold Elections | |
3. Transparency Dashboard | |
4. Complaint Process | |
Category | Governance |
Criticalness | High - Relates to elections, votes and administration |
Impact | High - All members of DAO will be affected |
Duration | 6 months |
Total Budget | $72K |
The four goals are explained in more detail below:
1. Adjust quorums.
Currently, the way votes are counted for quorum is 1 NFT = 1 vote. Current Quorums are:
250 votes for up to $10K
500 votes for $10K and above
500 votes for non-financial CIPs
1000 votes to change the OA
After a year of governance, CityDAO contributors have realized that it makes no sense for quorum to be the same for $11K and for $2 million, and it makes no sense that a non-financial vote has the same quorum as a CIP for $2 million. The new proposed system would still count 1 NFT as 1 vote for quorum with the following amendments:
- 1 vote = 1 quadratically-counted NFT
- Voter approval ratings must be above 75%
- An algorithm will be used to determine the quorums
FOR EXAMPLE:
CIP Request | Quorum (rounded up) |
---|---|
$0 (non-monetary)* | 50 |
$5K | 85 |
$10 | 100 |
$50K | 162 |
$100K | 208 |
$1,000,000 | 550 |
Maximum ($2,000,000) | 757 |
*To amend the Charter will require a quorum of 200 votes counted quadratically. This CIP does not intend to alter or amend the OA. Currently, it takes 1000 votes counted non-quadratically to amend the Operating Agreement (OA). This CIP does NOT change how votes are counted for altering or amending the OA. They will be counted non-quadratically as 1 NFT = 1 vote.
2. Hold Elections for Multisig
This CIP would create elections for eight (8) multisig signer positions. The multisig signers are responsible to check transactions, where the funds are being sent, to make sure that the transactions they are signing are legal and to follow all the requirements for a proper proposal for the protection of CityDAO. The multisig signers have the authority to consult with outside legal counsel where reasonable and necessary. The multisig signers will not have veto power over CIPs, but can help problem-solve and request additional information where necessary, to make sure that proposals further the mission of the DAO. The multisig will consult with the City Council on issues related to mission and CIP requirements.
3. Hold Elections for a City Council
This CIP would create elections for five (5) members of City Council, an officially-elected group with authority to help organize and delegate operational tasks, such as maintaining the website, discord, discourse, notion, social media including Twitter, mobile app (if there is one), meeting minutes, permissions, passwords, independent contractor agreements and contracts and to request proposals, hire and handle relationships with CPAs for bookkeeping and taxes. The City Council will schedule weekly meetings at regular times, which will not be changed with less than 48 hours notice. The City Council will consult with the multisig on issues related to mission and CIP requirements.
Election Method
If this CIP passes, there will be open elections for eight (8) multisig signers and five (5) City Council members, all with six-month terms that begin on the day the election ends. Any citizen may run for any position. No citizen may serve simultaneously on both the multisig and the council. There will be no hierarchy of members, but once the City Council has been chosen, they may determine a Chairperson to lead meetings.
To be elected, candidates must put up a platform statement on Discourse. All candidates will take part in a series of two (2) public debates with questions submitted in advance by any citizen, moderated and run by the Community and Media Guilds together. After the debates, separate ranked choice votes will be put on Snapshot. All elected members of the multisig and the City Council must be willing to be KYCâd.
Election Rules
- The election may not be used as an excuse to disparage the character of another member of the DAO.
- Candidates shall run as individuals and not as a group.
- Candidates may not make pledges, promises, or commitments of any sort.
Compensation and Budgets
We donât have a lot of money to spend, but itâs hard to ask people to work for free. The City Council also needs a budget to hire people. We want to pay people for their actual work, not their promise to work. If someone doesnât do work and still gets paid, that demotivates everyone. Therefore, compensation will be as follows:
-
Multisig Compensation: The multisig signers will receive $500 per month each, regardless of who actually signs the transactions. This is meant to incentivize all members to pay close attention to the transactions, their purpose, destination, suitability and potential liability to the DAO.
-
City Council Compensation: The City Council will have a Coordinape fund of $4K per month for their collective compensation.
-
City Council Budget: The City Council will have a budget of $24K over 6 months and the authority to execute agreements. This money cannot be spent on compensation for the City Council, but only for hiring and paying contributors to do work for the DAO.
Total: $24K + $24K + $24K = $72K*
*In an emergency event where CityDAO gets sued and is required to pay fees in excess of the funds in the City Council treasury, the City Council can put a CIP on Discourse and Snapshot concurrently, with no time limits required. Quorum will be however many people vote.
Removal
The multisig signers will have one week to sign or reject transactions. If a transaction is rejected, the signers must document reasons why and next steps. If any of the multisig signers refuse in bad faith to sign (2) or more transactions, they will be removed and the candidate who had the next highest vote will replace them. If there are no candidates left, a new election will be held for replacements. The members of the multisig can vote off any member with a 5 of 8 vote.
If any of the City Council members miss more than three (3) meetings, they will be removed and replaced in the same manner as the multisig signers. The City Council can vote off any member with a 4 of 5 vote. CityDAO Citizens can also call for a removal or replacement of members of either the multisig or the City Council with a CIP and a quorum of 100 votes.
4. Transparency Dashboard
For quality, transparency and clarity, all CityDAO projects must create a transparent and available document that provides all pertinent information on funding received, expenditures, milestones and benchmarks. This document will be written in plain English and will be available at all times to all citizens on the CityDAO website or Notion page. The Council will finalize the details of the process. This is not meant to punish people but to provide transparency. Project members must populate the dashboard in order to receive continued funding.
5. Complaint Process
A complaint may subject the citizen to penalties up to and including a prohibition on offending parties from holding administrative positions at CityDAO or in CityDAO projects.
Substance - What Constitutes a Complaint?
An allegation of wrongdoing related to projects, behavior, transactions, or violations of the rules at CityDAO.
Process - How is a Complaint Dealt With?
- Step 1 - Mediation by an individual who is agreed-upon by both parties.
Both parties must agree on an individual, preferably a CityDAO citizen, who will hear both sides of the argument and attempt to mediate between the two parties.
- Step 2 - Random jury
Both parties must write a complaint document. This complaint of wrongdoing needs to be complete and make specific allegations along with any evidence. The complaint will be reviewed by a randomly selected group of six (6) CityDAO citizens. Payment for âjury dutyâ is $20 per person. This jury of 6 people will make a binding decision based on the facts presented. If either party is not satisfied with the decision, they may appeal to a second random jury of three (3) CityDAO citizens. Same payment as above. A citizen cannot serve on both juries in one case.