Good Evening Everyone,
As some of you may know, I have been active in the #constitution Discord channel regarding the legal rights and liabilities that we as token-holders in CityDAO incur through our relationship with CityDAO LLC. As it stands, these are unclear. Because we are not members in the CityDAO LLC, we do not enjoy limited liability protection, and an action taken by our fellow Citizens could open any of us individually up to liability. Our DAO is unique in that it is associated with real property – land – which has a risk profile unlike other digital-only on-chain assets. Here’s a basic example to illuminate the risks:
The Citizens take a vote regarding setting up Parcel 1 as conversation land with an easement that allows the public to hike through it. 60% of Citizens vote and 70% vote in favor, passing the proposal. The Members of CityDAO LLC agree with this plan and enact it. (They are acting in accordance with the LLC Operating Agreement’s directive to follow the will of the Citizen token-holders.) One day, a young woman falls down while hiking through Parcel 1, is injured, and ultimately dies a few days later. Her family claims that we provided insufficient warning that the terrain is steep, rocky, and hiking it could result in loss of life. They claim that we are responsible out of negligence for her death. They sue CityDAO LLC along with the “Citizenship” token-holders.
These kind of suits happen all of the time, and the plaintiff (in our example the family) is incentivized to include as many defendants as possible to increase the potential payout. As you may have heard there is currently a lawsuit following the Astroworld Concert tragedy in Houston. Included in the suit are Travis Scott and Drake; their mere being on stage while it occurred, irrespective of how much their presence actually had to do with the tragic deaths, includes them.
At the same time, if we are made members of the LLC, our tokens are re-classified as securities and likely require registration with the SEC, which incurs its own costs and complexities, and it does not guarantee us absolute protection from personal liability. In fact, being made members of the LLC may not even be possible, and is really up to the discretion of Scott as (from what I have been able to tell from the public documentation) he is the sole-member of CityDAO LLC.
Closely related to these risks is our business model. It is currently being debated how we should use Parcel 0 and future Parcels, and whether we should seek to earn revenue from them in order to fund our operations (salaries, etc.) If we do seek to earn a profit from Parcel 0, we are likely to be legally classified as General Partners irrespective of our affiliation with CityDAO LLC. “[N]o governmental filing or public notice is required to create a general partnership. A general partnership is formed when two or more persons enter into an agreement for co-ownership of a business for profit” [1]. As general partners, we incur potentially unlimited liability, which puts our personal assets at risk, and we may be responsibility for CityDAO’s tax liabilities. This risk is unacceptable.
If, however, we agree not to seek a profit, token-holders gain legal recognition as an Unincorporated Nonprofit Association [2], and because of our stated mission – to explore on-chain ownership of real property – is scientific in nature, we can attempt recognition as a Section 501(c)(3) organization (usually known as a “Non-Profit” or “Charity”). The organization would likely need to exist as a legally separate entity from CityDAO LLC, and our Citizenship tokens be reissued by a new DAO. We would not longer be “Citizens”, but rather each token should be structured as a directorship on the org’s Board of Directors. This would clarify our legal rights and liabilities while maintaining our voting power and the ability to shape the future of our organization. As Directors in this organization, we would be insulated from personal liability and tax burdens, and our token purchases may be tax deductible [3].
I ask that you give this proposal serious consideration in spite of how anti-progress it may sound [4]. As it stands, our affiliation with CityDAO LLC as token-holders exposes each of us to serious legal and financial risk. If we recognize this fact and rectify it, we can achieve real progress. If we do not rectify it, I hope that you will join me in protecting yourself by selling your CityDAO tokens.
- https://a16z.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/DAO-Legal-Framework-Jennings-Kerr10.19.21-Final.pdf – See Footnote No. 27
- What is An Unincorporated Nonprofit Association? | Nolo
- Should Nonprofit Directors Worry About Personal Liability? | Nolo
- I did not come to this conclusion lightly or hastily, and was ultimately persuaded by Footnote No. 1. It is authored by the General Counsel of Crypto at
Andreessen Horowitz, and I recommend you read it in full.